Since character doesn't matter, what does?

Listening to the latest conservative talk rants.  I hear more and more people confused about what is important to liberals.  I admit it does seem to boggle the mind.  Why is it no big deal for Michael Moore while sober to blast Jews and such an unforgivable attrocity when Mel Gibson did it while drunk?  Hillary Clinton can be disrespectful to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld showing the whole world what kind of harpy she really is and no one even suggests that she was being (over the top) rude.  When the President of Iran, Icantadomyjob, has more respect for the elected President of the United States than almost all of the liberal leadership of the Democrat party, we have to ask ourselves.  How far does a liberal have to go before other liberals distribute even a tiny morsel of reproach?

I think the only thing a Democrat can do to get critisism from other liberals is to side with this country in the war inflicted upon us by terrorism.  What has happened to the Democrats?

I say we need to think back to, ("Character doesn't matter"), Bill.  Why would so many women support such a womanizing pig.  I remember thinking at the time when women would proclaim how his bad boy attitude was sexy, why would you even let this guy drive your daughter to school let alone drive this country including our defenses into the ground?

I realized then and am re-affirmed today that it is not what you say or do as long as you're politically aligned with the liberal ideals of the Democrat party.  Therefore I really don't believe it is illogical for us to conclude that since character doesn't matter at all to liberals then only politics does and in a liberals mind, it doesn't matter where you stand, it only matters what you stand for. 

In closing a cautionary word to all.  First conservatives don't allow yourselves to be confused by "seeming" contradictions made by the Socialist liberals, and liberals, is your political aggenda that important?  Do you really believe that if you accomplish your objective of Socialism it will have been worth the moral price it costs?  Remember from my previous post the inverse of a moral civil society is an uncivilized immoral chaos.

-1-